Changes between Version 51 and Version 52 of QtWebKitJournal


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Nov 23, 2009 6:25:04 AM (11 years ago)
Author:
Simon Hausmann
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • QtWebKitJournal

    v51 v52  
    771. Qt 4.6.0 Postportem
    88
    9    * What's good and what's bad in the release? Let's summarize.
    10 
     9   * What's good and what's bad in the release? Let's summarize:
     10      * What's good:
     11         * We got a lot of things done since the last release.
     12         * Many new webkit examples in Qt 4.6
     13         * Good contributions from _everyone_ (it's not an Oslo-only release)
     14         * S60 works, yay!
     15         * The irc channel has become very effective and the mailing list is a step forward.
     16         * Risk of integration of QtScript nicely managed.
     17      * What's bad:
     18         * Stability is "terrible".
     19         * We should've gone public with the QtScript port directly, not after the implementation was done.
     20         * S60 is not very well tested.
     21         * Not enough focus on stability, bugs and release schedule.
    1122
    1223Although this is merely a "status" meeting, if nothing else comes up I propose to have an "open end" with the following agenda item.