| 3 | |
| 4 | === Q&A Discussion === |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Q&A |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Chris Lord: Have you looked at/considered CSS Scroll-linked animations? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | maciej: we are interested, but don’t think it’s an immediate goal. I think we were among the earliest to propose - better than hand-rolled per-site. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | jen simmons: spec still under a lot of development |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Xan Lopez: Is xcbuild same file format, easier to add files manually? |
| 15 | |
| 16 | maciej: xcbuild replaced xcodebuild - I think the format is different, but not readily hand-editable. Considering systems where everything can be edited in human-readable plain-text files. I don’t think it solves this problem. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | Brian Kardell: No q, but this is an exciting list of things. |
| 19 | |
| 20 | alexg: Can you share how PLT5 works? |
| 21 | |
| 22 | maciej: At a high level, we have a system for capturing webpage content and then using a server that can handle serving, load the captured copy. Locally set up device with root cert to MITM the sites via a redirect to local server. Measures first meaningful paint, time to dom content loaded, subresources loaded. Considering better approach to what we consider a complete load of the page. Users don’t see subresources loading typically. |
| 23 | |
| 24 | Brian Kardell: Having a lot of conversations with Chrome re: :has() I wonder there is an opportunity to have someone involved more directly in those convos instead of a lot of go-between. (edited) |
| 25 | |
| 26 | maciej: I’m not the best to answer those questions, but it would be good to have one or more of our engineers in the area involved, yes. |
| 27 | |
| 28 | Jen: Open issues on the CSSWG repo for these conversations. Of course there are times where a deeper dive is needed, but for the need to have collaboration, the CSSWG is a great place to do that. |
| 29 | |
| 30 | maciej: Standards groups are the first choice for venue for these discussions. |
| 31 | |
| 32 | Brian Kardell: The WG is stuck on “how to solve all the problems” - end up in a circle not getting to the meat of the problem, come up with a proposal, etc. Trying to get proposals with enough critical thought around it. |
| 33 | |
| 34 | Myles: We are not interested in a WebGPU impl that isn’t in the GPU process. |
| 35 | |
| 36 | Saam: I don’t know if it would be helpful for folks to have a PLT capture tool, but maybe we can open source the tool itself. Reach out to me to continue the conversation. |
| 37 | |
| 38 | Brian Kardell: Can you explain more? |
| 39 | |
| 40 | Saam: It’s a proxy server to replay websites in a controlled environment. |
| 41 | |
| 42 | Brian Kardell: Has anyone considered the ability to report a bug from the dev tools for rendering/layout bugs? |
| 43 | |
| 44 | Carlos: I think PLT would be useful to us in open source - even without the content. |
| 45 | |
| 46 | Saam: I can look into that - When I first made it one of the ideas was to open source the tool - requires some amount of work for internal approval. |