Changes between Version 5 and Version 6 of April 2012 MeetingRethinkingRendering


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Apr 19, 2012 12:20:40 PM (9 years ago)
Author:
dpranke@chromium.org
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • April 2012 MeetingRethinkingRendering

    v5 v6  
    129129* (??): perhaps the confusion is over mixing functionality and ownership - there's only one tree, but we split the functionality over multiple classes
    130130  * maybe you could have one tree with different attributes instead of different subtrees (?) - this is a different way to look at the problem but hasn't really been investigated
     131  * smfr: you might end up re-creating trees just so you can keep track of what's going on during traversal
     132    * (??): maybe they would at least be homogenous trees in that case
     133
     134* (??): maybe render layers shouldn't be boxes, because they don't need all of the aspects of a box
    131135 
    132136